n view of the fact that most villages in the developing world are marginalized into
poverty and despair, largely due to the lack of money, we need to innovate the way that
village or community work is accounted for. Work in the current capitalist system is not done unless there is funding for it. In the private sector, a business, even a micro-business, must show some sort of profit to its owners. In the public sector, funding is often a matter of performing exhausting political maneuvers over many years.
Yet money is only an accounting entity, one that remunerates workers for their work; in it's most essential form. It is used to pay for the value of work; it is this value which is then accrued in the financial systems.
Why don't we allow villages in the developing world to have their own bank? A bank which would support it's own village currency.
The village currency must only exist in digital
form, or on the village accounting ledger.
In the final analysis, a bank in simply an
accounting ledger, and can be implemented
on a PC, or on a simple ledger book by a
village accountant.
Work that is performed within the village
for other village members, or for the community
at large, must be paid for in village funds.
These funds are accounted for in the village
bank, in a traditional debit and credit demand
deposit account system. Since capitalization
is in village funds, not in the external
currency, be it the national currency or
a global one like the Euro or the Dollar,
the control over the capitalization of the
individual accounts falls under the domain
of the village itself.
In the simplest instance, each villager him/herself
can capitalize their own accounts by performing
work for another village member, family or
to the community at large. That is to say,
that the value of the work performed is itself
the work-capital to be posted as a credit
to the worker, and a debit to the beneficiary
of the work. A debit is in effect taking
from the community; a credit is giving to
the community.
So if a person takes more than he/she gives,
a negative balance shows up in his/her account
on the village bank. A negative balance must
be covered by a loan or must be paid for
by actual work within the village system.
A loan must be granted to the recipient of
the work if he/she does not have sufficient
village money to pay for the work.
It is in granting loans that the village
bank system allows for one additional degree
of economic freedom over that of our current
global system. If an individual or a family
performs work for the community at large,
the community can grant a loan to itself,
thereby allowing village funds to be credited
to the individual or his/her family account,
and charged against the village global account.
This community capitalization allows for
people without any village capital to obtain
such, by performing community work. A loan
may also be granted in the case of an exchange
of goods for services within the village.
If an individual or family grants the use
of a good to another member or family within
the community, or to the community itself,
a credit for the value of the good in terms
of the village currency can be granted to
the giver with a debit posted to the giver,
since the work is covered by collateral transferred
to the giver in advance of the work performed.
This is in effect a three-way barter, where
the funds generated from barter become capitalized
in the village currency, and can then be
used to purchase additional goods or services
from other community members or families,
who are not necessarily parties to the original
barter transaction.
With a village bank, we can free the entire
world to perform work for themselves, in
work that is within their capacity to perform.
Granted, much of what is needed in a village
can not be obtained from work within the
village, or from goods already found within
it. It is for this reason that we must plan
all NGO development activities in terms of
village and global currency accounting entities.
Note that the only way to have work accounted
for is to go through the village bank, be
it a PC or a traditional paper ledger book.
External currency can not be used for intra-village
work, unless agreed upon by the parties involved.
In the same way, village currency can not
be converted to external currency unless
it is done so at the village bank. This is
the village currency nexus.
A village can be a virtual community linked
together by the Internet, or it may be an
actual village or town, or even a city. The
same concept can be applied to communities
of other kinds, such as religious groups,
political parties and other affinity groups.
This is the true work of the future, the
creation of cybernetic networks that support
financial independence in the developing
world. May the Lord Supreme grant us the
strength and persistence to see the dawn
of this day. 
Atlanta
March 15, 2001
frontpage |
headlines |
comments |
top